In the HR cycle, MapsTell gives leaders and employees a shared language for talking about behaviour. With behaviour placed on the map, the conversation is about what the map shows, not about the person. It shifts from judging someone to discussing how they work and what they need.
Most review cycles get stuck at the same point. Results can be measured and therefore discussed, but behaviour is sensitive. It is often described vaguely or left unspoken until frustration builds or something goes wrong.

The HR cycle already has set moments for talking about how someone works. The map gives those conversations a shared language. Four examples.

Most review conversations are about results. The ones that make a lasting difference also explore how someone works. The map makes that easier to discuss.
The leader has a place on the map too. That makes the question of what you need from each other a natural one, rather than a one-way street.
Instead of telling someone to work on their communication, it is about specific behaviour in specific situations, in words you both recognise.
A place on the map is a starting point, not the outcome. The map provides the nuance needed to look beyond stereotypes, allowing a genuine conversation to emerge.
MapsTell is a powerful tool for some conversations in the HR cycle, but not for others. We are always clear about two boundaries.

You do not roll this out to everyone at once. It starts with the people who lead the conversations and grows into the forms they use.
Below you will find the questions we hear most often, with clear answers.
The PersonalMap is not an instrument for assessing someone. In a conversation it gives language to behaviour and collaboration.
As a conversation tool, yes: you have an open conversation with a candidate about behaviour and about how that fits the role and the culture. As a selection criterion, no, because behaviour cannot by definition be linked to competencies.
Both conversation partners, at the very least. The conversation only works if the manager puts their own place on the table too, because then it is about the interaction and not only about the employee.
Behavioural preference is reasonably stable, so not often. With a new role, a changing context or after a number of years it can be worthwhile, not least because the conversation about the difference is often interesting.
In a Discovery Call, we look at your current HR cycle and where a shared language for behaviour could add the most value.